September 13, 2016

Hicks Thomas LLP Gets $50 Million Bench Trial Reversal in Hospital Land Dispute

By Hicks Thomas LLP


Robin L. HarrisonA Houston court decided to reverse the decision of a lower court, effectively reversing a land dispute judgment worth $50 million regarding Katy Pin Oak Hospital in Katy, Texas. The reversal followed a ruling by the 14th Court of Appeals that determined unsubstantiated liability theories might have been responsible for the original, $50 million judgment. The appeal of the case was led by Robin L. Harrison of Hicks Thomas LLP.

Before the Court of Appeals ordered a new trial, the 61st District Court in Harris County decided in favor of Pankaj Shah, who invested in Apex Katy Physicians LLC. Apex acted as landlord for a project involving Katy Pin Oak Hospital.

Mr. Shah filed wrongdoing claims against the hospital owners and the consulting group that set up the original deal, Turnaround Management Group. In the appeal, Turnaround (represented by Hicks Thomas LLP) argued that the $50 million judgment wasn’t supported by evidence in trial. The court agreed and reversed the original decision.

“I think the outcome will be much better the second time around, if there is a second trial,” Mr. Harrison commented, adding that “To get a large punitive damages award in a non-jury trial is unusual and, in this case we believe, entirely unwarranted.”

This case may be the first instance of a state appeals court using Crown Life Insurance Co. v. Casteel in a bench trial, a landmark Texas Supreme Court ruling from 2000 that reversed a jury verdict because it was also based on an unsound theory of liability.

Related Posts

Hicks Thomas Lawyers Win Take-Nothing Jury Verdict for Houston Manufacturer

Worker had sued for up to $1 million, but Facebook photos undercut his story HOUSTON – A judge has confirmed a jury’s take-nothing verdict in favor of a Houston-based manufacturer that was sued for damages of up to $1 million by a worker who was injured when he improperly tried…

Full Text

Recent Ninth Circuit Cases of Interest – Surreptitious Recording

With an office in California, Hicks Thomas LLP monitors decisions issued by the California appellate courts and by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A recent decision by the latter caught our attention. Safari Club International v. Rudolph involved a bitter dispute between SCI and its former president,…

Full Text

Amendments to the Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure and to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure-What’s of Interest to Civil Litigators

On December 1, amendments to the various sets of federal procedural rules took effect. The top of the federal judiciary’s “Current Rules of Practice and Procedure” webpage has a useful list of these amendments, including links to full-text and redlined versions of the amended rules and to various explanatory materials….

Full Text

Call: 713-547-9100